Essay Topics
Types of Essays
Essay Checklist
Word Counter
Readability Score
Essay Rewriter
Too often have people asked this question and we believe the confusion in this matter is solely due to a lack of knowledge. The scientific community hasn't exactly been sitting idle for the past half century, though despite of all the modern day computing power, it is difficult to predict earthquakes with a hundred percent certainty. Some people have claimed that they've built successful systems such as the VAN method which is said to detect low frequency electric signals seven hours before an earthquake, with a tolerance rate of 30 minutes. However, there is still debate amongst seismic researchers that there is simply too much randomness that poses a hindrance to successfully creating a perfect model. The earth is extremely heterogeneous, quantitative theory about earthquakes is absent and fault zones are inaccessible. Scientists have been stubbornly trying to disprove this by trying to find out other reasons for the difficulties we face in getting reliable predictions. Fluid properties and standard laws of displacement are known to us if we are to study the turbulent motion of fluids, but in order to have reliable readings of air movement inside a closed room, it has to be calculated for at least five minutes. Similarly the earth's atmosphere circulation can be successfully and precisely calculated for a few days if the inertial force is strong, hence the weather updates we see on television. So now that we know that even long term weather detection is impossible, let's look at what makes earthquakes different. The problem with predicting earthquakes is that the inertial effects are only strong when the subsequent seismic-wave propagation and earthquake rupture is active. Unfortunately, the timescale of the two aforementioned aspects is merely within seconds. This brings us to the second point to be discussed; how is it that weather is more easily predicted than earthquakes? The process of predicting earthquakes is asymmetric in nature. If you are to look at things from time perspective, the number of foreshock is noticeably low or in some cases none at all. While the seismicity is asymmetric in regards to time, turbulent flow of fluids isn't, therefore the predictability of earthquakes is unreliable and hit-and-miss, even if the lead times are very small. The first event of earthquake is called the "Main Shock" and in 50% earthquake events, the main shock is the largest. The start of an earthquake sequence is abrupt which is followed by a series of aftershocks. These are called rupture events, and are supposed to be the stopping phase of an earthquake. The most extreme atmospheric turbulence event is a tornado with a lead time of half an hour, while the most extreme earthquake can occur without any warning whatsoever. We can detect tornados half an hour in advance, but we can't detect which direction the tornado is headed, particularly if it's a tropical hurricane, as a small change can alter its trajectory in a major way. Concluding it all, weather prediction can be authentic for at least 4 to 5 days while earthquakes of the most destructive nature can happen without any notice whatsoever. This is mainly why scientists are unable to make a breakthrough in terms of accurately predicting earthquakes.
Essay Writing Checklist
The following guidelines are designed to give students a checklist to use, whether they are revising individually or as part of a peer review team.
Introduction
  • Is the main idea (i.e., the writer's opinion of the story title) stated clearly?
  • Is the introductory paragraph interesting? Does it make the reader want to keep on reading?
Body Paragraph
  • Does each body paragraph have a clear topic sentence that is related to the main idea of the essay?
  • Does each body paragraph include specific information from the text(including quoted evidence from the text, if required by the instructor)that supports the topic sentence?
  • Is there a clear plan for the order of the body paragraphs (i.e., order of importance, chronology in the story, etc.)?
  • Does each body paragraph transition smoothly to the next?
Conclusion
  • Is the main idea of the essay restated in different words?
  • Are the supporting ideas summarized succinctly and clearly?
  • Is the concluding paragraph interesting? Does it leave an impression on the reader?
Overall Essay
  • Is any important material left unsaid?
  • Is any material repetitious and unnecessary?
  • Has the writer tried to incorporate "voice" in the essay so that it has his/her distinctive mark?
  • Are there changes needed in word choice, sentence length and structure, etc.?
  • Are the quotations (if required) properly cited?
  • Has the essay been proofread for spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc.?
  • Does the essay have an interesting and appropriate title?
Sample Exploratory Essay: How Difficult Is It to Predict Earthquakes?
Trending Essay Topics
Reference
Feel free to use content on this page for your website, blog or paper we only ask that you reference content back to us. Use the following code to link this page:
Terms · Privacy · Contact
Essay Topics © 2018

Sample Exploratory Essay: How Difficult Is It To Predict Earthquakes?

Words: 536    Pages: 2    Paragraphs: 9    Sentences: 23    Read Time: 01:56
Highlight Text to add correction. Use an editor to spell check essay.
              Too often have people asked this question and we believe the confusion in this matter is solely due to a lack of knowledge. The scientific community hasn't exactly been sitting idle for the past half century, though despite of all the modern day computing power, it is difficult to predict earthquakes with a hundred percent certainty.
             
              Some people have claimed that they've built successful systems such as the VAN method which is said to detect low frequency electric signals seven hours before an earthquake, with a tolerance rate of 30 minutes. However, there is still debate amongst seismic researchers that there is simply too much randomness that poses a hindrance to successfully creating a perfect model.
             
              The earth is extremely heterogeneous, quantitative theory about earthquakes is absent and fault zones are inaccessible. Scientists have been stubbornly trying to disprove this by trying to find out other reasons for the difficulties we face in getting reliable predictions.
             
              Fluid properties and standard laws of displacement are known to us if we are to study the turbulent motion of fluids, but in order to have reliable readings of air movement inside a closed room, it has to be calculated for at least five minutes. Similarly the earth's atmosphere circulation can be successfully and precisely calculated for a few days if the inertial force is strong, hence the weather updates we see on television.
             
              So now that we know that even long term weather detection is impossible, let's look at what makes earthquakes different. The problem with predicting earthquakes is that the inertial effects are only strong when the subsequent seismic-wave propagation and earthquake rupture is active. Unfortunately, the timescale of the two aforementioned aspects is merely within seconds.
             
              This brings us to the second point to be discussed; how is it that weather is more easily predicted than earthquakes? The process of predicting earthquakes is asymmetric in nature. If you are to look at things from time perspective, the number of foreshock is noticeably low or in some cases none at all. While the seismicity is asymmetric in regards to time, turbulent flow of fluids isn't, therefore the predictability of earthquakes is unreliable and hit-and-miss, even if the lead times are very small.
             
              The first event of earthquake is called the "Main Shock" and in 50% earthquake events, the main shock is the largest. The start of an earthquake sequence is abrupt which is followed by a series of aftershocks. These are called rupture events, and are supposed to be the stopping phase of an earthquake.
             
              The most extreme atmospheric turbulence event is a tornado with a lead time of half an hour, while the most extreme earthquake can occur without any warning whatsoever. We can detect tornados half an hour in advance, but we can't detect which direction the tornado is headed, particularly if it's a tropical hurricane, as a small change can alter its trajectory in a major way.
             
              Concluding it all, weather prediction can be authentic for at least 4 to 5 days while earthquakes of the most destructive nature can happen without any notice whatsoever. This is mainly why scientists are unable to make a breakthrough in terms of accurately predicting earthquakes.
Earthquake Essay Natural Disasters Essay 
References:
Silver, N. (2015). The Signal And The Noise Why So Many Predictions Fail - But Some Don't. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Tazieff, H. (1992). Earthquake prediction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bolt, B. A. (1993). Earthquakes and Geological Discovery. New York: Scientific American Library.
Mulargia, F., & Geller, R. J. (2003). Earthquake Science and Seismic Risk Reduction. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Hough, S. E. (2007). Richter's Scale: Measure of an Earthquake, Measure of a Man. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Earthquake Storms: The Fascinating History and Volatile Future of the San Andreas Fault. (2014). S.l.: Pegasus Books.
Advances in Earthquake Prediction. (2008). Berlin: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & KG. - See more at: http://www.customwritings.com/blog/essay-topics-and-ideas/20-topics-earthquake-prediction-exploratory-essay.html#sthash.4jCDRRVU.dpuf
Tip: Use our Essay Rewriter to rewrite this essay and remove plagiarism.
Next Natural Disasters Essay: The Indian Ocean Tsunami
Next Earthquake Essay: Research Paper On The Destruction Of Earthquakes

Add Notes

Have suggestions, comments or ideas? Please share below. Don't forget to tag a friend or classmate.
clear
Formatting Help
Submit
Bohemian Rhapsody | Scott D Davis | KMSpico v9.3.